Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 107–123
© Mikidenko N. L., Storozheva S. P., Ivanouskaya I. I., Borisova A. A., 2021
UDC: 
378:004+316:378+378.147

Evaluating the potential of enhancing teachers’ digital competencies to meet the needs of diversification of education and learning

Mikidenko N. L. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Storozheva S. P. 2 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Ivanouskaya I. I. 3 (Mogilev, Republic of Belarus), Borisova A. A. 4 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Technical University (NETI), Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Science
2 Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Science
3 Belarusian-Russian University (BRU)
4 Novosibirsk State Technical University (NETI)
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 806
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article presents the results of reflection on the readiness of the education system to respond to the transformational challenges of digital economy through the formation of relevant human resources. It identifies an imbalance in the response of the education system to the demand of society and business for training human resources with digital competences. The imbalance makes it difficult to implement new in-demand educational trajectories based on the principle of individualization of employee’s professional and personal self-realization. The purpose of the study is to identify the potential of enhancing teachers' digital competence in accordance with the needs of education diversification within digital transformation.

Materials and Methods. The methodological basis for the study consists of reflexive modernity concepts (E. Giddens, W. Beck), reflecting qualitative changes of the social world in the context of digitalization; digital sociology of changes in social relations influenced by digital technologies (V. F. Nitsevich), mediating ordinary social contacts in everyday communication and creating new digital opportunities and risks. Existing and required digital competences of teachers were identified on the basis of desk research of teachers’ digital skills and competences models and empirical research on technical university teachers' opinions (survey method). Statistical methods were used to analyze and interpret the research data.

Results. The study has identified the potential of the education system to adjust to the challenges of educational and career transformations. It is emphasized that the ways of potential realization can vary from ‘soft’ ones which imply gradual mastering based on several program versions and formats to the so called stress-options of forced competence mastering within a limited period of time. The necessity of introducing regulating measures for the transition to a new role of a teacher in the digital model of education is justified (e.g. teacher as a manager, teacher as a facilitator of the educational process).

Conclusions. The article concludes that differentiation based on the level of digital competences and the degree of readiness to master digital technologies limits the speed of relevant response of the education system to the transformational demands of society. The need for content elaboration and teaching health-saving technologies within the digital culture is highlighted. Since the level of digital competencies of teaching staff is the basis for the development of educational institutions and the competitiveness of the country, measures are to be taken in order to facilitate the development of digital competencies.

Keywords: 

Digital transformation of education; Diversification of education; Digital technologies in education; Digital competencies of teachers.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:46233037

For citation:
Mikidenko N. L., Storozheva S. P., Ivanouskaya I. I., Borisova A. A. Evaluating the potential of enhancing teachers’ digital competencies to meet the needs of diversification of education and learning. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 107–123. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2103.06
References: 
  1. Zhou X., Milecka-Forrest M. Two groups separated by a shared goal: how academic managers and lecturers have embraced the introduction of digital technologies in UK Higher Education. Research in Learning Technology, 2021, vol. 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2446
  2. Kraynov G. N. Challenges of digitalization to Russian higher education. Vestnik MIRBIS, 2021, no. 1, pp. 55–60. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25634/MIRBIS.2021.1.6 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44816242
  3. Shannon C., Reilly J., Bates J. Teachers and information literacy. Journal of Information Literacy, 2019, vol. 13 (2), pp. 41–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11645/13.2.2642
  4. Lobova S. V., Bocharov S. N., Ponkina E. V. Digitalization: Mainstream for the university education and challenges for the teachers. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2020, vol. 24 (2), pp. 92–106. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.02.016 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44101328
  5. Novikov S. G. Russian society and education at the bifurcation point: Choice of a project of the future. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 11–22. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515- 2021-1-3   
  6. Begalinov A. S., Ashilova M. S., Begalinova K. K. On the image of higher education in the post-covid world: Formation and development of the new type of thinking. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 110–123. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.07 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44849696
  7. Pfanenstil I. A., Panarin V. I. Digital educational and problem «humanization». Professional Education in the Modern World, 2020, vol. 10 (2), pp. 3656–3665. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200202 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43125751
  8. Kravchenko S. A. The increasing role of the digital body in the human capital: Changes in the nature if communications. Communicology, 2020, vol. 8 (3), pp. 15–28. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2020-8-3-15-28 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44116348
  9. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Virtualization of social communication in education: Values-based approach to information development (a critical review). Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (2), pp. 73–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2002.05 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42772185

10. Krylova N. P., Tyulyu G. M., Levashov E. N. E-Learning Integration with traditional learning in a university environment: Academic and administrative factors and conditions. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10 (6), pp. 200–219. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2006.11 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44478889

11. Filatov V. V., Gobysh A. V. The role of e-learning in the modern high education. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2020, vol. 10 (4), pp. 4243–4251. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2020-4-08 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44608684

12. Nabokova L. S., Rogacheva Yu. S. Digital educational environment in the pandemia context: The student audience intentions. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2020, vol. 10 (3), pp. 4041–4052. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200314 https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44106985

13. Usacheva O. V., Chernyakov M. K. Assessment of university willingness to the transition to digital educational environment. Higher Education in Russia, 2020, Vol. 29 (5), pp. 53–62. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-5-53-62 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42895012

14. Kolomeytseva А. А. Multi-tasking reality of the educational space to the challenges of higher school digitalization. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 84–93. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-10  

15. Sorina G. V., Rikel A. M. «Online against desire»: involvement and responsibility. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 214–225. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-24

16. Rapanta C., Botturi L., Goodyear P., Guàrdia L., Koole M. Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Science and Education, 2020, vol. 2 (3), pp. 923–945. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

17. Corry M., Stella J. Teacher self-efficacy in online education: A review of the literature. Research in Learning Technology, 2018, vol. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2047

18. Houston D., Meyer L., H., Paewai S. Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2006, vol. 28 (1), pp. 17–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500283734

19. Liu Z.-J., Tretyakova N., Fedorov V., Kharakhordina M. Digital literacy and digital didactics as the basis for new learning models development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2020, vol. 15 (14), pp. 4–18. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14669

20. Hinchliffe L. J., Rand A., Collier J. Predictable information literacy misconceptions of first-year college students. Communications in Information Literacy, 2018, vol.12 (1), pp. 4–18. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2018.12.1.2

21. Ricardo-Barreto C., Molinares D. J., Llinás H., Santodomingo J. P., Acevedo C. A., Rodríguez P. A., Navarro C. B., Villa S. V. Trends in using ICT resources by professors in HEIS (higher education institutions). Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2020, vol. 19, pp. 395–425. https://doi.org/10.28945/4601

22. Sánchez-Cruzado C., Santiago Campión, R., Sánchez-Compaña M. T. Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13 (4), pp. 1858. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858

23. Koksharov V. A., Sandler D. G., Kuznetsov P. D., Klyagin A. V., Leshukov O. V. Pandemiya kak vyzov razvitiyu seti vuzov v Rossii: differentsiatsiya ili kooperatsiya? The pandemic as a challenge to the development of university networks in Russia: Differentiation or collaboration? Educational Studies Moscow, 2021, no. 1, pp. 52–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-52-73  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44871811

24. Stebbing D., Shelley J., Warnes M., Mcmaster C. What academics really think about information literacy? Journal of Information Literacy, 2019, vol. 13 (1), pp. 21–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11645/13.1.2338  

25. Hollis H. Information literacy as a measurable construct. Journal of Information Literacy, 2018, vol. 12 (2), pp. 76–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11645/12.2.2409

26. Starkey L. A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2020, vol. 50 (1), pp. 37–56. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2019.1625867

27. Castañeda L., Esteve F., Adell J. Por qué es necesario repensar la competencia docente para el mundo digital? Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 2018, vol. 56, pp. 6. DOI: http://doi.org/10.6018/red/56/6

28. Falloon G. From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020, vol. 68 (5), pp. 2449–2472. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

29. Andryukhina L. M., Lomovtseva N. V., Sadovnikova N. O. Digital didactics concepts as the basis for designing of advanced education of teachers of vocational training. Vocational Education and Labor Market, 2020, no. 1, pp. 30–43. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.24411/2307-4264-2020-10103 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42630991

Date of the publication 30.06.2021