Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 142–160
© Pankova N. B., Alchinova I. B., Kovaleva O. I., Lebedeva M. A., Khlebnikova N. N., Cherepov A. B., Noskin L. A., Karganov M. Y., 2021
UDC: 
612.821.1

Correlation between the accuracy and speed of hand control in primary schoolchildren and the amount of screen time

Pankova N. B. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Alchinova I. B. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Kovaleva O. I. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Lebedeva M. A. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Khlebnikova N. N. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Cherepov A. B. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Noskin L. A. 2 (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation), Karganov M. Y. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Research Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology
2 B.P.Konstantinov Petersburg Institute of Nuclear Physics
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 757
Abstract: 

Introduction. The means and methods of computerized learning introduced into the education system in recent years are changing the attitude towards writing with a pen. Children are increasingly typing on a keyboard. This brings into focus research investigations aimed at identifying the possible influence of the above-mentioned type of educational activity on the indicators of psychomotor skills. The purpose of this research is to study accuracy and speed indicators of psychomotor coordination when working with hands in primary school students, depending on the amount of computer load (screen time).

Materials and Methods. The study involved 4205 primary schoolchildren in grades 1-4 from 66 educational settings in Moscow (5 academic years, testing took place in October and March-April; all samples were independent). Indicators of psychomotor coordination (speed, accuracy, and smoothness of movements) when performing a motor test using "computer movement meter" (CMM) device were evaluated. The amount of lesson and out-of-school screen time was evaluated by teachers, relying on the hygiene standards: 0 points – no load, 1 point – compliance with hygiene standards, 2 points – twice exceeding the standards, 3 points – exceeding the standards by 3 or more times. Statistical data processing was performed using nonparametric criteria.

Results. The research revealed the correlation between the total (lesson and out-of-school) screen time and indicators of psychomotor coordination in primary schoolchildren. The most obvious differences in psychomotor indices were found at the very beginning of school education – in October, in the 1st grade: in children with a minimum amount of computer load, the indicators of speed and accuracy were the worst. Speed indicators of psychomotor skills in groups of children (especially boys) with a high computer load have seasonal variability in the form of improvement by the end of the school year. Accurate indicators of psychomotor skills, on the contrary, with an increase in the amount of general computer load, lose variability and decrease. The smoothness of movements did not depend on the screen time.

Conclusions. The identified changes in the psychomotor skills of primary school students who are active computer-users can be considered as a positive adaptive response in the form of developing new motor skills.

Keywords: 

School health monitoring; Psychomotor coordination; Movement speed; Movements accuracy; Movements smoothness; Primary school students; Screen time; Hygiene standards.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:46233039

For citation:
Pankova N. B., Alchinova I. B., Kovaleva O. I., Lebedeva M. A., Khlebnikova N. N., Cherepov A. B., Noskin L. A., Karganov M. Y. Correlation between the accuracy and speed of hand control in primary schoolchildren and the amount of screen time. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 142–160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2103.08
References: 
  1. Aizman R. I. Methodological principles and methodical approaches to the monitoring of the students' health and health saving activity of educational organizations. Journal of Pedagogical Innovation, 2019, no. 1, pp. 5–13. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37334216
  2. Baiguzhin P. A., Shibkova D. Z., Aizman R. I. Factors affecting psychophysiological processes of information perception within the context of education informatization. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (5), pp. 48–70. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1905.04 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41271740
  3. Bezborodova M. A., Bezborodova L. A. Forming of graphic writing skills in primary school. Science and School, 2016, no. 3, pp. 111–115. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27322051
  4. Bezrukikh M. M., Ivanov V. V., Orlov K.V. Differences between concepts of brain development in modern neurobiology and teachers’ knowledge. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 125–150. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.08 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44849697
  5. Kamenskaya V. G., Tomanov L. V. The dynamics of intellectual functions in Russian preschoolers during the emergence of Internet technologies. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 2019, vol. 12 (3), pp. 56–63. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps190305 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41113743
  6. Krivolapchuk I. A., Gerasimova A. A., Chernova M. B. Functional development of children 6–7 years old with different levels of informatization of living conditions. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2020, no. 5, pp. 121–135. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2005.12 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44216852
  7. Krivolapchuk I. A., Chernova M. B. Influence of the level of informatization on the physical fitness of 8-9-year-old children. New Research, 2020, no. 4, pp. 113–121. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46742/2072-8840-2020-64-4-113-121 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44562431
  8. Kuchma V. R., Sedova A. S., Stepanova M. I., Rapoport I. K., Polenova M. A., Sokolova S. B., Aleksandrova I.E ., Chubarovsky V. V. Life and wellbeing of children and adolescents studying remotely during the epidemic of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). School and University Medicine and Health Issues, 2020, no. 2, pp. 4–23. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43924859
  9. Pankova N. B. Mechanisms of short-term and long-term adaptation. Pathogenesis, 2020, vol. 18 (3), pp. 77–86. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25557/2310-0435.2020.03.77-86 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44208613

10. Pankova N. B., Lebedeva M. A., Bogdanova E. V., Kovaleva O. I., Karganov M. Yu. Dynamics of indicators of psychomotor coordination among schoolchildren in Moscow for years 2003–2013. Preventive and Cilinical Medicine, 2014, no. 1, pp. 56–60. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21645601

11. Pankova N. B., Lebedeva M. A., Noskin L. A., Khlebnikova N. N., Karganov M. Yu. The effect of different volumes of computer load on the latent periods of a simple sensorimotor reaction in primary schoolchildren. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 2020, vol. 13 (2), pp. 112–122. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/jpps200210 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43145532

12. Semenova M. V., Shibkova D. Z. Gender and age-related features of psychomotor indicators in 10–16-year-old students (longitudinal study). Psychology. Psychophysiology, 2021, vol. 14 (1), pp. 119–127. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/jpps210112 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44964986

13. Adolph K. E., Franchak J. M. The development of motor behavior. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2017, vol. 8 (1–2), pp. 1430. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1430

14. Beck M. M., Lind R. R., Geertsen S. S., Ritz C., Lundbye-Jensen J., Wienecke J. Motor-enriched learning activities can improve mathematical performance in preadolescent children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016, vol. 10, pp. 645. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00645

15. Escolano-Pérez E., Herrero-Nivela M. L., Losada J. L. association between preschoolers' specific fine (but not gross) motor skills and later academic competencies: educational implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, vol. 11, pp. 1044. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01044

16. Fernández-Méndez L. M., Contreras M. J., Mammarella I. C., Feraco T., Meneghetti C. Mathematical achievement: The role of spatial and motor skills in 6-8 year-old children. PeerJ, 2020, vol. 8, pp. e10095. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10095

17. Fischer U., Suggate S.P., Stoeger H. The implicit contribution of fine motor skills to mathematical insight in early childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, vol. 11, pp. 1143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01143

18. Geertsen S. S., Thomas R., Larsen M. N., Dahn I. M., Andersen J. N., Krause-Jensen M., Korup V., Nielsen C. M., Wienecke J., Ritz C., Krustrup P., Lundbye-Jensen J. Motor skills and exercise capacity are associated with objective measures of cognitive functions and academic performance in preadolescent children. PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11 (8), pp. e0161960. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161960

19. Georges C., Cornu V., Schiltz C. The importance of visuospatial abilities for verbal number skills in preschool: Adding spatial language to the equation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2021, vol. 201, pp. 104971. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104971

20. Iverson J. M. Developing language in a developing body: The relationship between motor development and language development. Journal of Child Language, 2010, vol. 37 (2), pp. 229–261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990432

21. Kahl T., Grob A., Segerer R., Möhring W. Executive functions and visual-spatial skills predict mathematical achievement: Asymmetrical associations across age. Psychological Research, 2021, vol. 85 (1), pp. 36–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01249-4

22. Lima R. A., Stodden D. F., Pfeiffer K. A., Larsen L. R., Barros M. V. G., Bugge A., Andersen L. B. Dynamic balance, but not precision throw, is positively associated with academic performance in children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17 (8), pp. 2790. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082790

23. Macdonald K., Milne N., Orr R., Pope R. Associations between motor proficiency and academic performance in mathematics and reading in year 1 school children: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatrics, 2020, vol. 20 (1), pp. 69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-1967-8

24. Macdonald K., Milne N., Orr R., Pope R. Relationships between motor proficiency and academic performance in mathematics and reading in school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, vol. 15 (8), pp. 1603. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081603

25. Milne N., Cacciotti K., Davies K., Orr R. The relationship between motor proficiency and reading ability in Year 1 children: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatrics, 2018, vol. 18 (1), pp. 294. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1262-0

26. Vogel S. A. Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1990, vol. 23 (1), pp. 44–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221949002300111

Date of the publication 30.06.2021