Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 42–58
UDC: 
37.015.31

Teacher’s capacity for psychological safety as a condition for schoolchildren’s psychological safety

Smyk Y. V. 1 (Irkutsk, Russian Federation), Kachimskaya A. Y. 1 (Irkutsk, Russian Federation)
1 Irkutsk State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article reviews modern approaches to the role of personality of the teacher in ensuring students’ psychological safety as well as the resources used by the teachers in order to promote students’ psychological safety.
The purpose of this article is to clarify the capacity for psychological safety of the teacher as one of the conditions for schoolchildren’s psychological safety by means of the subjective assessment of its components by students.
Materials and Methods. The study relies on the ideas of Russian psychologists about psychological safety of an individual and learning environment, as well as ideas about the personality structure as a possible foundation for building the capacity of teacher's psychological safety. The authors used the following theoretical methods: analysis, generalization and reviewing scholarly literature on the safety of educational environment. The empirical methods include a survey, analysis and interpretation of research data.
Results. The authors defined the concept of ‘the capacity for teacher's psychological safety’ and clarified its role in promoting the psychological safety of schoolchildren. The structural model of ‘the capacity for teacher's psychological safety’ has been proposed and described. It includes three components: teacher’s personality traits, professional and communicative characteristics. Empirical data allowed the authors to describe each component of the model.
Conclusions. The article concludes that teacher’s capacity for psychological safety is a condition for ensuring psychological comfort and safety of schoolchildren. The subjective assessment of the components of the teacher’s capacity for psychological safety by schoolchildren enabled the authors to reveal their characteristics. According to the obtained empirical data, the personality component consists of such characteristics as openness and sincerity. Professional characteristics include attentiveness and orientation to students’ achievements. The communicative component comprises teacher’s fairness and objectivity.

Keywords: 

Psychological safety; Teacher’s capacity for psychological safety; Safety of the educational environment; Psychological security; Psychological comfort; Personal resource; Subjective assessment; Personality of the teacher.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:44849692

For citation:
Smyk Y. V., Kachimskaya A. Y. Teacher’s capacity for psychological safety as a condition for schoolchildren’s psychological safety. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 42–58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.03
References: 
  1. Baeva I. A. Psychological security of educational environment in the structure of integrated security of educational organization. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2017, no. 6, pp. 12–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30611526   
  2. Baeva I. A., Gayazova L. A. Psychological safety of the educational environment in assessments of modern adolescents. Scientific Opinion, 2018, no. 1, pp. 57–62. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32362545
  3. Baeva I. A., Laktionova E. B., Gayazova L. A., Kondakova I. V. Ensuring psychological safety of adolescents in the learning environment. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2019, no. 194, pp. 7–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42344740
  4. Baeva I., Semikin V. The security of educational environment, psychological culture, and psychical health of schoolchildren. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2005, vol.  5 (12), pp. 7–19. (In Russian) URL:  https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12853742  
  5. Baeva I. A., Yakimanskaya I. S. Monitoring psychological safety of educational environment and education quality in the context of modernization. Psychological-Educational Studies,2013, no. 1, pp. 81–90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18995270 
  6. Berberyan A. S. Potential of personal development in the context of humanization. Methodology of Modern Psychology, 2019, no. 9, pp. 3–7. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39214034 
  7. Zhuravleva E. A. A nonviolence principle in a collaboration of teachers with a child: capabilities and limitations of training. Izvestia of the Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2017, no. 1, pp. 74–82. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29894382  
  8. Kachimskaya A. Y., Smyk Y. V. Subjective perception of psychological security by schoolchildren in the space of interpersonal relations with the teacher. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol.  10  (1), pp. 97–111. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2001.06 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42525588  
  9. Korol А. D. Dialogue-based system of heuristic education: Experience of projection and realization. Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 3. Philology. Pedagogy. Psychology, 2016, vol. 6 (1), pp. 57–64. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29204783
  10. Lyusova О. В. Psychological safety of educational environment and subjective well-being of trainees. Vesnik of Volgograd State University, 2015, no. 2, pp. 132–140. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu11.2015.2.16  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24254408   
  11. Nevzorova M. S., Maruhina I. F. Formation of professional-pedagogical on-purpose of future teachers. Science and Education, 2018, vol. 1 (3–4), pp. 27. (In Russian) URL:  https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37118418
  12. Polivanova N. I., Rivina I. V. Eclectic organization of school educational environment as a factor of its instability. Psychological Science and Education, 2009, no. 2, pp. 52–61. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12860731    
  13. Prokhorov A. O., Afanasyev P. N. Risks of socialization and psychological safety of the educational environment in schools.  Philology and Culture, 2017, no. 4, pp. 236–243. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32278012
  14. Alzobiany I. The qualities of effective teachers as perceived by Saudi EFL students and teachers. English Language Teaching, 2020, vol. 13 (2), pp. 32–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n2p32
  15. Goetz T., Bieleke M., Gogol K., van Tartwijk J., Mainhard T., Lipnevich A. A., Pekrun R. Getting along and feeling good: Reciprocal associations between student-teacher relationship quality and students’ emotions. Learning and Instruction, 2021, vol. 71, pp. 101349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101349
  16. Jiang J., Vauras M., Volet S., Salo A. Teacher beliefs and emotion expression in light of support for student psychological needs: A qualitative study. Education Science, 2019, vol. 9 (2), pp. 68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020068 
  17. Johnson H. H., Avolio B. J. Team psychological safety and conflict trajectories’ effect on individual’s team identification and satisfaction. Group and Organization Management, 2019, vol.  44 (5), pp. 843–873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1059601118767316
  18. Liu X., Gong Sh.-Y., Zhang H., Yu Q., Zhou Zh. Perceived teacher support and creative self-efficacy: The mediating roles of autonomous motivation and achievement emotions in Chinese junior high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2021, vol. 39, pp. 100752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100752
  19. Nöthling J., Suliman S., Martin L., Simmons C., Seedat S. Differences in abuse, neglect, and exposure to community violence in adolescents with and without PTSD and depression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2019, vol. 34 (21–22), pp. 4357–4383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886260516674944
  20. Pengpid S., Peltzer K. Associations of number of victimizations with mental health indicators and health-risk behaviours among a nationally representative sample of in-school adolescents in Curaçao. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2021, vol. 111, pp. 104831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104831
  21. Rey L., Quintana-Orts C., Mérida-Lуpez S., Extremera N. Being bullied at school: Gratitude as potential protective factor for suicide risk in adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, vol. 10, pp. 662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00662
  22. Sianko N., Hedge J. M., McDonell J. R. Differential adjustment among rural adolescents exposed to family violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2019, vol. 34 (4), pp. 712–740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886260516645574
  23. Trevorrow T., Zhou E. S., Dietch J. R., Gonzalez B. D. Position statement: Start middle and high schools at 8:30 AM or later to promote student health and learning. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2019, vol. 9 (1), pp. 167–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby020
  24. Walsh S. D., Sela T., De Looze M., Craig W.,Cosma A.,  Harel-Fisch Y., Boniel-Nissim M., Malinowska-Cieślik M., Vieno A., Molcho M., Ng K., Pickett W. Clusters of contemporary risk and their relationship to mental well-being among 15-year-old adolescents across 37 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2020, vol. 66 (6), pp. S40–S49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.012
  25. Wang H. Nonviolence as teacher education: a qualitative study in challenges and possibilities. Journal of Peace Education, 2018, vol. 15 (2), pp. 216–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2018.1458294  
  26. Yablon Y. B. Students' willingness to seek help from school staff when coping with parental maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 2020, vol. 103, pp. 104443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104443
  27. Yablon Y. B. Student–teacher relationships and students’ willingness to seek help for school violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2010, vol. 27 (8), pp. 1110–1123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407510381255
Date of the publication 28.02.2021