Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 136–148
© Kozhevnikov A. O., Chernobrov A. A., 2019
UDC: 
372.016:811+81’23+81’27

Identifying background knowledge and socio-cultural competence in individuals of different age groups (with the main focus on the concepts of “freedom” and “order”)

Kozhevnikov A. O. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Chernobrov A. A. 2 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
2 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1064
Abstract: 

Introduction. Common background knowledge is a condition of successful communication between different cultures and generations. This article deals with the findings of a sociolinguistic survey conducted within the linguistic research into the concepts of “freedom” and “order”. The purpose of the research is to identify background knowledge and socio-cultural competence in individuals of different generations.
Materials and Methods. The authors used a sociolinguistic survey which was carried out in two age groups of native Russian speakers. The first group were secondary school students (Grades 6–10, № 6 Berdsk Lyceum, Novosibirsk region, the Russian Federation) aged between 12 and 15 years. The second (comparison) group consisted of adults aged between 35 and 60 years and older.
The employed method was a part of a comprehensive research devoted to the concepts of “freedom” and “order” in native Russian speakers and was focused on identifying cultural competence within particular age groups. The research objectives were to assess secondary school students’ cultural competence and to reveal similarities and differences in understanding concepts of “freedom” and “order” between age groups.
Results. The study clarifies the lingua-cultural background of the concepts of “freedom” and “order”. The findings show that the most preferable source of information for the first group of respondents is the Internet. The second group predominantly uses television as a source of information.
Another important finding is that high availability of information does not contribute to the development of cultural competence in today’s secondary school students. On the contrary, the level of background knowledge is decreasing within the context of the developed mass culture.
Conclusions. Taken together, these results suggest that associative fields of the basic cultural concepts are indistinct in the younger group of respondents.

Keywords: 

Cultural competence; Sociolinguistic survey; Concept; Basic cultural concepts; Background knowledge; Lingua-cultural background of the concepts.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:41586638

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 97.477 Self-initiated Expatriates | International Assignments | Cultural Intelligence

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079616668&origin=...

Identifying background knowledge and socio-cultural competence in individuals of different age groups (with the main focus on the concepts of "freedom" and "order")

For citation:
Kozhevnikov A. O., Chernobrov A. A. Identifying background knowledge and socio-cultural competence in individuals of different age groups (with the main focus on the concepts of “freedom” and “order”). Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 136–148. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1906.09
References: 
  1. Gray B. Culture, cultural competence and the cross-cultural consultation. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2018, vol. 54, issue 4, pp. 343–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13769
  2. Thomas D. C. Cultural intelligence. International Management, Wiley Publ., 2015, vol. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom060051
  3. Earley P. C. Redefining interactions across cultures and organizations: Moving forward with cultural intelligence. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2002, vol. 24, pp. 271–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24008-3
  4. Raver J. L., Van Dyne L. Developing Cultural Intelligence. Cambridge University Press Publ., 2017, pp. 407–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091067.020
  5. McCalman J., Jongen C., Bainbridge R. Organisational systems’ approaches to improving cultural competence in healthcare: A systematic scoping review of the literature. International Journal for Equity in Health, 2017, vol. 16, issue 1, article number: 78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0571-5
  6. Sinclair K. Unsettling discourses of cultural competence. Journal of Childhood Studies, 2019, vol.  44, no. 4, pp. 36–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs444201919210
  7. Pascual M. S. The sociolinguistic integration of immigrant populations: Reflections on its study. Languages, 2019, vol. 4 (2), pp. 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020035
  8. Garridoa R., Garcia-Ramireza M., Balcazarb F. E. Moving towards community cultural competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2019, vol. 73, pp. 89–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.09.002
  9. Grudeva E. A. Concept osen’/autumn in perception of contemporary Russian and English languages native speakers (by association experiment data). Philological Studies. Theory and Practice, 2013, no. 5–1, pp. 41–43. (In Russian) URL:  https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18905156  
  10. Dokuka S. Video clip thinking. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2013, no. 2, pp. 169–176. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19013678
  11. Kolesnik М. А. Features of the perception of the Russian ethnic group in the youth environment of the city of Krasnoyarsk according to the results of the associative experiment with the word “Russian”. Sociodynamics, 2016, no. 4, pp. 59–67. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25638813
  12. Lombina T. N., Yurchenko O. V. The features of teaching children with mosaic thinking. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 2018, no. 1, pp. 45–50. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32323565
  13. Murzich A. N. Development of language university students’ culture-educational competence. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2015, no. 1, pp. 174–177. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22989197
  14. Nozhenko E. Lingvoculturology as the methodology of national character stereotypes studies. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2006, vol. 5, no. 23, pp. 67–69. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13050518   
  15. Romanov N. А. Clip culture in modern media space. Human. Culture. Education, 2017, no. 3 (25), pp. 97–106 (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32354531
  16. Savel'eva К. V. The role of cultural competencein the development of modern youth. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being, 2016, vol. 5, no. 6А, pp. 280–290. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29313711
  17. Fomenko Yu. V. About concept and conceptology. Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology, 2015, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–123. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23213008
  18. Shafikov S. G. Cultural linguistics, language and national mentality. Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2013, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 763–777. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20418106
Date of the publication 31.12.2019