Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 62–78
© Perikova E. I., Atamanova I. V., Bogomaz S. A., 2020
UDC: 
159.923.33

Specific features of psychological readiness for innovative activity (with the main focus on young adults in St. Petersburg and Tomsk)

Perikova E. I. 1 (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation), Atamanova I. V. 2 (Tomsk, Russian Federation), Bogomaz S. A. 2 (Tomsk, Russian Federation)
1 Saint-Petersburg University
2 Tomsk State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1202
Abstract: 

Introduction. Building a competitive system of higher education oriented to innovative socioeconomic development is impossible without studying the specifics of university students’ readiness for innovative activity. The aim of the research is to analyze university students’ psychological readiness for innovative activity in St. Petersburg and Tomsk.
Materials and Methods. In order to study readiness for innovative activity, the authors evaluated innovativeness and psychological parameters of activity applying the following methods: D. V. Lyusin’s Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire, E. Yu. Mandrikova’s Self-Organization of Activity Questionnaire, D. A. Leontiev and E. N. Osin’s Reflexivity Type Assessment Test, the World Values Survey by R. Inglehart, adapted by R. K. Khabibulin, The Satisfaction with Life Scale developed by E. Diener and adapted by E. N. Osin and D. A. Leontiev, and The Change Response Styles Questionnaire developed by T. U. Bazarov and M. P. Sycheva. The sample was made up of 474 people: 291 residents of St. Petersburg and 183 residents of Tomsk. The mean age was 22.5 ± 3.9.
Results. The study results indicate that specific features of psychological readiness for innovative activity in young adults are determined by their residence. Young adults from St. Petersburg show a greater readiness for innovative activities in terms of initiating innovations, while the participants from Tomsk, adhering to traditional values, are more prone to accept and support changes. The authors reveal six profiles of innovativeness and the psychological system of activity, namely "innovators", "conservatives", "reactive", "implementing", "innovation-oriented" and "stability-oriented", which have different representation in young adults from St. Petersburg and Tomsk. The authors conclude that the innovativeness of Russian young adults is manifested in such characteristics as purposefulness, sensitivity to oneself and others (emotional intelligence) and the level of systemic reflection.
Conclusions. The findings show that it is necessary to take into account the specifics of young adults’ readiness for innovative activity when transforming the system of higher education in different cities of Russia.

Keywords: 

Readiness for innovative activity; Psychological system of activity; Innovativeness; Change response styles; Emotional intelligence; Youth adults; System of higher education.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:42525586

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 99.370 Pedagogical Support | Educational Process | Professional Competence

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081253449&origin=...

Specific features of psychological readiness for innovative activity (with the main focus on young adults in St. Petersburg and Tomsk)

For citation:
Perikova E. I., Atamanova I. V., Bogomaz S. A. Specific features of psychological readiness for innovative activity (with the main focus on young adults in St. Petersburg and Tomsk). Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 62–78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2001.04
References: 
  1. Mikidenko N. L., Storozheva S. P., Kharlamov A. V. The competence-based model of higher engineering education: Features of implementation in the modern labor market. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (3), pp. 169–184. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1903.10  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38538214 
  2. Stepanova L. N., Zeer E. F. Soft skills as predictors of students’ life self-fulfillment. Education and Science Journal, 2019, vol. 21 (8), pp. 65–89. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-8-65-89  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41341128
  3. Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. In: Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. (Eds) Entrepreneurship and knowledge exchange. Routledge, New York, 2015, pp. 117–158. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315795638
  4. Khatri R., Henderson C., Cole R., Froyd J. E., Friedrichsen D., Stanford C. Characteristics of well-propagated teaching innovations in undergraduate STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 2017, vol. 4, art. no. 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0056-5
  5. Walder A. M. Pedagogical innovation in Canadian higher education: Professors’ perspectives on its effects on teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2017, vol. 54, pp. 71–82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.001
  6. Klucharev G. A., Dezhina I. G. Russian education for innovative economy: “The pressure points”. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2018, no. 9, pp. 40–48. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/S013216250001957-5  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36367657.
  7. Poznanskaya S. G., Kutishchev S. A., Rezanova I. A. Formation of readiness of future engineers-builders to innovative activity. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 75–79. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32878992
  8. Shuklina Z. N., Bekisheva K. K. Main approaches to forming the innovative environment of the region. Science Review, 2015, no. 15, pp. 437–446. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24846003
  9. Stock R. M., von Hippel E., Gillert N. L. Impacts of personality traits on consumer innovation success. Research Policy, 2016, vol. 45 (4), pp. 757–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.12.002
  10. Bogomaz S. A., Nepomnashaja V. A. Tо а problem of search of the psychological basis of development of the innovational component of the person in youth and adolescence. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2007, no. 25, pp. 78–82. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12513652
  11. Sheketera A. A., Bogomaz S. A. Features of formation of implicit theories and their relation to students’ intellectual and personal potential. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol.  200, pp. 372–376. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.080
  12. Autio E., Kenney M., Mustar P., Siegel D., Wright, M. Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 2014, vol. 43 (7), pp. 1097–1108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
  13. Hassi L., Rekonen S. How individual characteristics promote experimentation in innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2018, vol. 22 (4), pp. 1850038. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S136391961850038X
  14. Taylor S. P. What Is Innovation? A study of the definitions, academic models and applicability of innovation to an example of social housing in England. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2017, vol.  5 (11), pp. 128–146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.511010
  15. Mansfeld M. N., Hölzle K., Gemünden H. G. Personal characteristics of innovators – An empirical study of roles in innovation management. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2010, vol. 14 (6), pp. 1129–1147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363919610003033
  16. Leontiev D., Osin E. “Good” and “Bad” reflection: From an explanatory model to differential assessment. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014, vol. 11 (4), pp. 110–135. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24899593
  17. Bazarov T. U., Sycheva M. P. Development and approbation of change response styles questionnaire. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2012. vol. 5 (25), pp. 12. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18265498
  18. Bityutskaya E. V., Bazarov T. Yu. Features of perception of life events by people with different preferred styles of response to changes. Voprosy Psychologii, 2019, no. 3, pp. 94–106. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39207112 
  19. Cabello R., Sorrel M. A., Fernández-Pinto I., Extremera N., Fernández-Berrocal P. Age and gender differences in ability emotional intelligence in adults: A cross-sectional study. Developmental Psychology, 2016, vol. 52 (9), pp. 1486–1492. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000191
  20. Zeidner M., Matthews G., Shemesh D. O. Cognitive-social sources of wellbeing: Differentiating the roles of coping style, social support and emotional intelligence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2016, vol. 17 (6), pp. 2481–2501. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9703-z
  21. Atamanova I. V., Kozlova N. V., Bogomaz S. A., Zalevsky V. G., Neyaskina Yu. Yu. Specificity of personality-environment interaction on the example of students from three Russian cities. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2018, no. 41, pp. 90–105. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/41/11 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34978156
  22. Miao C., Humphrey R. H., Qian S. A cross-cultural meta-analysis of how leader emotional intelligence influences subordinate task performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of World Business, 2018, vol. 53 (4), pp. 463–474.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.01.003
  23. Altındağ E., Kösedağı Y. The relationship between emotional intelligence of managers, innovative corporate culture and employee performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 210, pp. 270–282.  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.367
  24. Truman S. A Generative framework for creative learning: A tool for planning creative-collaborative tasks in the classroom. Transnational Working Papers, 2011, vol. 1, no. 1101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v1i1.518
  25. Tenzer H., Yang P. Personality, Values, or attitudes? Individual-level antecedents to creative deviance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2019, vol. 23 (2), pp. 1950009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500099

 

Date of the publication 29.02.2020