Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 97–111
© Kachimskaya A. Y., Smyk Y. V., 2020
UDC: 
37.015.31

Subjective perception of psychological security by schoolchildren in the space of interpersonal relations with the teacher

Kachimskaya A. Y. 1 (Irkutsk, Russian Federation), Smyk Y. V. 1 (Irkutsk, Russian Federation)
1 Irkutsk State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 1305
Abstract: 

Introduction. The authors study the problem of creating a psychologically safe educational environment through the transformation of relationships between teachers and schoolchildren. The purpose of the article is to identify the characteristics of the subjective perception of psychological security by students of different ages as a factor in the safe and resourceful development of their personality in the space of interpersonal relations with a teacher.
Materials and Methods. The methodological basis of the study was the ideas of Russian psychologists about children’s active position in the learning process, in particular, S.L. Rubinstein’s student-centered approach. The authors applied such theoretical methods as reviewing and analysis of scholarly literature on the safety of educational environment. The empirical methods included questionnaires, mathematical and statistical analysis of the research results.
Results. Data obtained in studying the subjective perception of psychological security by schoolchildren in interaction with teachers are presented. Compared to primary school students, adolescents experience a greater degree of insecurity in their interaction with teachers. High school students pinpoint the factors of psychological threat, among which subjective importance is dominated by coercion by teachers to rigorously fulfill educational requirements. At the same time, the age-related features of the development of senior schoolchildren provide them with the opportunity to use developed intrapersonal resources to cope with the situation of psychological distress at school. The data obtained highlight the role of the student and the role of the teacher in the process of ensuring the psychologically safe educational environment of the school.
Conclusions. The study concludes that subjective perception of psychological security is determined by age-specific factors. Psychological safety of educational relations among students of different ages is provided either by the determining position of the teacher, or by the resource potential of the student’s personality itself.

Keywords: 

Interpersonal relations; Psychological safety; Psychological security; Subjective perception; Psychological threat; Psychological pressure; Personality subjectivity; Personal resources.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:42525588

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 97.317 Student-teacher Relationships | Student Engagement | Kindergarten

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081277584&origin=...

 

Subjective perception of psychological security by schoolchildren in the space of interpersonal relations with the teacher

For citation:
Kachimskaya A. Y., Smyk Y. V. Subjective perception of psychological security by schoolchildren in the space of interpersonal relations with the teacher. Science for Education Today, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 97–111. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2001.06
References: 
  1. Abulkhanova K. A.Methodological principle of a subject: Study of person's life course. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2014, vol. 35 (2), pp. 5–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21560866 
  2. Andreev A. S. Resources of personal growth. Humanitarian and Pedagogical Education, 2017, vol. 3 (1), pp. 38–44. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28864735
  3. Baeva I. A. Mental health of adolescents. How to support it? Psychological Science and Education, 2012, no. 4, pp. 11–17. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18948818  
  4. Baeva I. A., Yakimanskaya I. S. Monitoring psychological safety of educational environment and education quality in the context of modernization. Psychological Science and Education, 2013, no.  1, pp. 81–90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18995270
  5. Doryeva E. A. Coping resources sufficiency problem. Bulletin of Nekrasov Kostroma State University, 2013, vol. 19 (5), pp. 191–194. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20935983  
  6. Zhuravlev A. L., Kharlamenkova N. E. Contemporary representations about personal development and the succession of L.I. Antsyferova's dynamic approach ideas. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 2016, vol. 1 (4), pp. 61–73. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27526968
  7. Kachimskaya A. Yu. On the question of the methods of psychological protection of children in the modern communicative space. World of Science, 2016, vol. 4 (4), pp. 41. (In Russian) URL:  https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27201979  
  8. Korol A. D. Interdisciplinary and meta-subject functions of dialogue in education. Bulletin of the Institute of Human Education, 2018, no. 1, pp. 8. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36433237
  9. Leontiev D. A. Autoregulation, resources, and personality potential. Siberian Psychological Journal, 2016, no. 62, pp. 18–37. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/62/3 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27664144
  10. Miklyaeva A. V., Khoroshikh V. V., Volkova E. N. Subjective factors of gifted adolescents’ psychological well-being: A theoretical model. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9 (4), pp. 36–55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1904.03 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39256953
  11. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Human environments as a source of stress and a resource to overcome it: returning to the psychology of everyday life. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2019, vol. 40 (5), pp. 15–26. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920006072-5 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39543752
  12. Pushkareva T. G. Model of the educational environment as a way of formation of social competence: structure and content. Bulletin of Pedagogy and Psychology of Southern Siberia, 2012, no. 2, pp. 15–28. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26020695
  13. Rostovtseva M. V., Shaidurova O. V., Goncharevich N. A., Kovalevich I. A., Kudashov V. I. Level of adaptation capacity among undergraduate students. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8 (2), pp. 43–61. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1802.03 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34961312
  14. Slobodchikov V. I. The formation of the human in man is an imperative of national education. Psychological Research and Education, 2011, no. 3, pp. 81–90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17064475
  15. Smyk Yu. V. The definition of child abuse in the family: The value context. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, no. 6, pp. 38–42. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23639890
  16. Kharlamenkova N. E. About the spiritual bases of activity of the person: one of contemporary approaches to studying of the personality in psychology. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 2018, vol. 3 (1), pp. 77–84. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32756845
  17. Khotinets V. Yu., Pletnikov A. I. Coherence of individual and cultural values as a factor of protection of adolescents from bullying in the school environment. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2018, vol. 39 (4), pp. 72–85. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920000072-5 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35744939
  18. Elkonin D. B. Thoughts on the reform of the soviet education system. Education Issues, 2008, no.  2, pp. 5–32. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11712271  
  19. Afkinich J. L., Klumpner S. Violence prevention strategies and school safety. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 2018, vol. 4 (9), pp. 637–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/700656
  20. Anderson K. L., Weimer M., Fuhs M. W. Teacher fidelity to conscious discipline and children's executive function skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2020, vol. 51, pp. 14–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.08.003
  21. Blakey J. M., Glaude M., Jennings S. W. School and program related factors influencing disclosure among children participating in a school-based childhood physical and sexual abuse prevention program. Child Abuse and Neglect, 2019, vol. 96, pp. 104092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104092
  22. Koenen A. K., Vervoort E., Verschueren K., Spilt J. L. Teacher–student relationships in special education: The value of the teacher relationship interview. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessmen,2019, vol. 37, pp. 874–886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918803033  
  23.  Lam S., Zwart C., Chahal I., Lane D., Cummings H. Preventing violence against children in schools: Contributions from the Be Safe program in Sri Lanka. Child Abuse and Neglect, 2018, vol.  76, pp. 129–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.016
  24. Nguyen M. N., Watanabe-Galloway S., Hill J. L., Siahpush M., Tibbits M. K.Ecological model of school engagement and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-aged children. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2019, vol. 28, pp. 795–805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1248-3
  25. Panlilio C.C., Jones Harden B., Harring J. School readiness of maltreated preschoolers and later school achievement: The role of emotion regulation, language, and context. Child Abuse and Neglect, 2018, vol. 75, pp. 82–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.06.004
  26. Valiente C., Parker J. H., Swanson J., Bradley R. H., Groh B. M. Early elementary student-teacher relationship trajectories predict girls’ math and boys’ reading achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2019, vol. 49, pp. 109–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.05.001
  27. Van der Kleij F. M. Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2019, vol. 85, pp. 175–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010
  28. Zatto B. R. L., Hoglund W. L. G. Children's internalizing problems and teacher–child relationship quality across preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2019, vol. 49, pp.  28–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.05.007
Date of the publication 29.02.2020