Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 7–22
© Mosunova L. A., Diner E. V., Buldakova J. V., 2019
UDC: 
372.8

Psychological and educational principles of developing students’ speech culture in the process of creating media texts

Mosunova L. A. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation), Diner E. V. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation), Buldakova J. V. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation)
1 Vyatka State University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 6492
Abstract: 

Introduction. The conditions of modern information culture have had a significant impact on speech activities of young people and have given rise to an increasingly important problem of understanding media texts. Currently, its solution is spontaneous and urgently requires the identification of psychological and educational principles to form the basis for developing speech culture, which contributes to a deeper perception and understanding of media texts. The research goal of the article is to identify psychological and pedagogical principles for developing students’ speech culture in the process of creating media texts.
Materials and Methods. The study was conducted using a complex of theoretical approaches and empirical methods, which allowed to develop and test a theoretical model of teaching speechwriting. The research methodology is based on psychological, educational and psycholinguistic approaches for understanding the structure of speech activity and clarifying the role of imagination in it. The method of computing the interconnected elements coefficient within the text has become the main in assessing the effectiveness of teaching speechwriting.
Results. The study has established a conceptually new idea of formulating the purpose of teaching speechwriting in the context of revealing the message and the meaning of media texts. Furthermore, the article reveals the need for identifying the target, subject and operational components of speechwriting. These ideas have become the basis for creating a generalized model of teaching speechwriting. The implementation of this model in the educational process has proved the effectiveness of the activity approach to learning and meaning-comprehension in the situations of collaborative productive and creative activities.
Conclusions. Psychological and educational principles which can become the basis for developing the speech culture within the process of creating media texts (speechwriting) were identified.

Keywords: 

Media text; Speechwriting; PR text; Speech culture; Information culture; Understanding the meaning of the text.

URL WoS/RSCI: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:38191461

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 86.956 Visual-World Paradigm | Language Comprehension | Psycholinguistics

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065968313&origin=...

Psychological and educational principles of developing students' speech culture in the process of creating media texts

For citation:
Mosunova L. A., Diner E. V., Buldakova J. V. Psychological and educational principles of developing students’ speech culture in the process of creating media texts. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 7–22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.01
References: 
  1. Benitez-Burraco A., Boeckx C. Possible functional links among brain- and skull-related genes selected in modern humans. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00794
  2. Bruss K. S. Ghosting authenticity: Characterization in corporate speechwriting. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2011, vol. 25, issue 2, pp. 159–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651910389147
  3. Evans G. A. L., Ralph M. A. L., Woollams A. M. Seeing the meaning: Top-down effects on letter identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, vol. 8, pp. 322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00322
  4. Geraths C., Kennerly M. Pinvention: Updating commonplace books for the digital age. Communication Teacher, 2015, vol. 29, issue 3, pp. 166–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2015.1028555
  5. Goldzwig S. R. The anti-intellectual presidency: The decline of presidential rhetoric from George Washington to George W. Bush (review). Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 2010, vol. 13, issue 1, pp. 145–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.0.0129
  6. Guerra E., Knoeferle P. Semantic interference and facilitation: Understanding the integration of spatial distance and conceptual similarity during sentence reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, vol. 9, pp. 718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00718
  7. Johnson T. B., Rabin K. PR faculty: What are their qualifications? Public Relations Review, 1977, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 38–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(77)80017-9
  8. King C. M. The write stuff: Teaching the introductory public relations writing course. Public Relations Review, 2001, vol. 27, issue 1, pp. 27–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00068-6
  9. Leuprecht C., Skillicorn D. B. Incumbency effects in U.S. Presidential Campaigns: Language patterns matter. Electoral Studies, 2016, vol. 43, pp. 95–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.008
  10. Limpo T., Alves R. A. Teaching planning or sentence-combining strategies: Effective SRSD interventions at different levels of written composition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2013, vol. 38, issue 4, pp. 328–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.004
  11. Mosunova L. A. The formation of the information culture of students in the system of electronic education: A theoretical and experimental study. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 2018, vol. 45, issue 3, pp. 128–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688218030036  
  12. Nykopp M., Marttunen M., Erkens G. Coordinating collaborative writing in an online environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2018, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9203-3
  13. O'Gara R. J. Public relations writing and media techniques: Dennis L. Wilcox and Lawrence W. Nolte New York: Longman, 494 pp., 1997. Public Relations Review, 1997, vol. 23, issue 4, pp. 411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90056-4
  14. Parkinson J., Demecheleer M., Mackay J. Writing like a builder: Acquiring a professional genre in a pedagogical setting. English for Specific Purposes, 2017, vol. 46, pp. 29–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.12.003
  15. Richardson M. Ghosting politics: Speechwriters, speechmakers and the (re)crafting of identity. Cultural Studies Review, 2017, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 3–17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/csr.v23i2.5472
  16. Rossette F. Discursive divides and rhetorical staging, or the transcending function of oratory. Journal of Pragmatics, 2017, vol. 108, pp. 48–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.11.002
  17. Sekerina I. A., Campanelli L., Van Dyke J. A. Using the visual world paradigm to study retrieval interference in spoken language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, vol. 7, pp. 873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00873
  18. Sproule J. M. The four minute men and early twentieth-century public speaking pedagogy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 2010, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 309-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.0.0143  
  19. Wanna J. Speechwriting for government in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2011, vol. 70, issue 3, pp. 333–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2011.00737_2.x
  20. Westbury С., Hollis G. Conceptualizing syntactic categories as semantic categories: Unifying part-of-speech identification and semantics using co-occurrence vector averaging. Behavior Research Methods, 2018, pp. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1118-4
  21. Yeari M., van den Broek Р. A computational modeling of semantic knowledge in reading comprehension: Integrating the landscape model with latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 2016, vol. 48, issue 3, pp. 880–896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0749-6
  22. Danilova Y. Y., Uchirov P. S. Concept power as means of speechwriter's language personality objectivation. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2012, no. 6, pp. 46–51. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18018376
  23. Dzhalalov S. S., Rudakova I. A. Methods and techniques of learners'' teaching of sense reading in a value-sense textbook. Russian Psychological Journal, 2013, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 41–51. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2013.2.3 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20147439
  24. Dzyaloshinsky I. M. Perception and understanding mediatexts in the system of personal communicative competence. Media. Information. Communication, 2012, no. 3, pp. 12–14. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22879830
  25. Zemskaya J. N., Kuznetsova E. A. Spicraighting and copyrighting: Philology on service at integrated marketing communications. Philology and Man, 2014, no. 4, pp. 137–143. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22518689
  26. Kovaleva N. B. Media educational perspectives of the reflexive-positional development of the personality and abilities of the students. Media Education, 2017, no. 1, pp. 9–25. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28394524
  27. Mesenyashina L. A. A problem of speechwriter’s competences. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2016, no. 9, pp. 119–125. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27470255
  28.  Mosunova L. A. Training of students-philologists in structural-functional projecting of literature essay. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 20. Pedagogical Education, 2006, no. 1, pp. 84–116. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9248370
  29.  Rudenko A. M., Kotlyarov V. V. Impact of the means of mass communication on modern society. Media Education, 2017, no. 3, pp. 134–142. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29909173
  30. Fedorov A. V. Theoretics of media culture of foreign countries. Media Education, 2012, no. 3, pp. 127–135. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17668919
  31. Fedorchenko L. V. Specraighting as a form of political consulting in modern Russia. Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: History and Political Sciences, 2012, no. 2, pp. 155–161. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18425998
  32. Khakhaleva A. Y. Typological principles of PR-discourse. Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and Pedagogical Sciences, 2013, no. 668, pp. 81–96. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19002515
  33. Tsukerman G.A., Kleshch N.A. Understanding conceptual texts and mastering concepts. Psychological Science and Education, 2017, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 19–27. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/pse.2017220302 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29898528
  34. Tsukerman G. A., Mitina O. V. Diagnostics of Critical Thinking. Voprosy Psychologii, 2015, no.  3, pp. 15–30. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25510936
Date of the publication 30.04.2019