Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7–26
© Primchuk N. V., Aranova S. V., 2019
UDC: 
373.51 + 378.147.88

Facilitating continuity in university-based initial teacher education

Primchuk N. V. 1 (St-Petersburg, Russian Federation), Aranova S. V. 1 (St-Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 6852
Abstract: 

Introduction. The authors investigate the problem of facilitating continuity in contemporary education. The purpose of the research is to characterize the specifics of implementing continuity in university-based teacher education.
Materials and Methods. The activity approach was chosen as a methodological foundation of the research. The authors applied the following methods: questionnaires, classroom observation, structured interviews and focus-group discussions of teachers, students and professional tutors supervising initial training students on teaching practice. The analysis and generalization of recent studies on continuity in contemporary education were also carried out.
Results. The article reveals the directions of implementing the modern understanding of continuity in education. The authors propose a new format of teaching practice based on “the problem approach” to collaborative interaction of students, school teachers and academic staff. The results of reflexive self-assessments of student teaching are summarized.
Conclusions. The authors summarize the specifics of implementing continuity in initial teacher education.

Keywords: 

Principle of continuity; Future teachers training; Student practice; Professional tasks; Professional tests; Interdisciplinary competence; Spatial-environmental interaction.

URL WoS/RSCI:  https://www.webofscience.com/wos/rsci/full-record/RSCI:38165980

Prominence Percentile SciVal: 99.370 Pedagogical Support | Educational Process | Professional Competence

URL SCOPUS: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065068147&origin=...

Facilitating continuity in university-based initial teacher education

For citation:
Primchuk N. V., Aranova S. V. Facilitating continuity in university-based initial teacher education. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1901.01
References: 
  1. Aranova S. V. The analysis of the conceptual construct of studies on visualisation of educational information. Scientific Opinion, 2018, no. 2, pp. 29–35. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32733828
  2. Bayborodova L. V., Gruzdev M. V., Kharisova G. I. Psychological and pedagogical training of students to implement labour functions. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2018, no. 1, pp. 66-72. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32530200
  3. Kolykhalov M. I., Pushkareva E. A. Processes of globalization and regionalization in the development of modern society: Integration of research approaches in social and humanitarian knowledge. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8 (4), pp. 94–108. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1804.06
  4. Lebedev O. The end of compulsory education?. Educational Studies Moscow, 2017, no. 1, pp. 230–260. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28879317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-1-230-259
  5. Lebedev O. Y. Thoughts on objectives and outcomes. Educational Studies Moscow, 2013, no. 1, pp. 007–024. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19026450
  6. Nalivayko N. V. Globalization and the change of the value reference points of Russian education. Philosophy of Education, 2012, no. 6, pp. 27–32. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18152673 
  7. Osipova S. I., Tereschenko Yu. A., Klimovich L. V. Fundamental education for "digital generation". Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2012, no. 5, pp. 156. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18319055
  8. Tryapitsina A. P., Pisareva S. A. Guidance of content updates of future teachers professional training. Man and Education, 2016, no. 3, pp. 12–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29006702 
  9. Perminova L. M. From classical to post-non-classical concepts in didactics and education. Pedagogy, 2009, no. 8, pp. 7–14. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13065758
  10. Plotnikova A. L., Borisova E. S. Futurological vision for the future of Russian education. Izvestiya of the Samara Russian Academy of Sciences Scientific Center. Social, Humanitarian, Medicobiological Sciences, 2017, vol. 19 (5), pp. 13–16. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32780525
  11. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Fundamental knowledge in the continuing education: Methodology and axiology of the problem. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6 (1), pp. 87–98. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1601.08
  12. Khasan B. I., Vatathsak I. S. Conflicting interests and purposes in professional self-determination. Sociology, 2014, no. 4, pp. 32–39. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27721065
  13. Hodenko N. M. Influence of developing environments on personal self-determination of high school students. Scientific Notes: Online Academic Journal of Kursk State University, 2013, no. 2, pp. 276–284. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19084887
  14. Yakimanskaya I. S. School as the organization: Use of the method of a focus-group for recognition of problems of educational sphere. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universitrta. Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2013, vol. 2 (1), pp. 61–67. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20843549
  15. Boevé A. J., Meijer R. R., Bosker R. J., Vugteveen J., Hoekstra R., Albers C. J. Implementing the flipped classroom: an exploration of study behaviour and student performance. Higher Education, 2017, vol. 74, issue 6, pp. 1015–1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0104-y  
  16. Badri M., Nuaimi A. А., Guang Y., Rashedi A. А. School performance, social networking effects, and learning of school children: Evidence of reciprocal relationships in Abu Dhabi. Telematics and Informatics, 2017, vol. 34, issue 8, pp. 1433–1444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.06.006
  17. Beneyto-Seoane M., Collet-Sabé J. Analysis of current teachers training on ICTs’ skills. Proposing a new perspective based on teachers’ previous competences, experiences and skills. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 2018, vol. 22 (4), pp. 91–110. (In Spanish) DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i4.8396
  18. Blömeke S., Busse A., Kaiser G., König J., Suhl U. The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016, vol. 56, pp. 35–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.003
  19. Bølling M., Otte C. R., Elsborg P., Nielsen G., Bentsen P. The association between education outside the classroom and students’ school motivation: Results from a one-school-year quasi-experiment. International Journal of Educational Research, 2018, vol. 89, pp. 22–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.004
  20. Bouw E., Zitter I., de Bruijn E. Characteristics of learning environments at the boundary between school and work – A literature review. Educational Research Review, 2019, vol. 26, pp. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.12.002
  21. Bronkhorst L. H., Akkerman S. F. At the boundary of school: Continuity and discontinuity in learning across contexts. Educational Research Review, 2016, vol. 19, pp. 18–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.04.001
  22. Chu B. C., Guarino D., Mele C., O'Connell J., Coto P. Developing an online early detection system for school attendance problems: results from a research-community partnership. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 2018, in Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.09.001
  23. Edwards M. R., Clinton M. E. A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment. Higher Education, 2018, pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0275-9
  24. Foster J., Yaoyuneyong G. Teaching innovation: equipping students to overcome real-world challenges. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2016, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 42–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2015.1134195
  25. Kim L. E., Klassen R. M. Teachers' cognitive processing of complex school-based scenarios: Differences across experience levels. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 73, pp. 215–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.006
  26. Koeslag-Kreunen M. G., Van der Klink M. R., Van den Bossche P., Gijselaers W. H. Leadership for team learning: the case of university teacher teams. Higher Education, 2018, vol. 75, issue 2, pp. 191–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0126-0
  27. Krantz J., Fritzén L. From expert to novice? The influence of management by documents on teachers’ knowledge base and norms. Professions and Professionalism, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. e2113. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/pp.2113
  28. With M. Are Teachers Increasingly Leaving the Profession?. Professions and Professionalism, 2017, vol. 7 (2), pp. e1723. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/pp.1723
  29. Matthews K. E., Dwyer A., Hine L., Turner J. Conceptions of students as partners. Higher Education, 2018, vol. 76, issue 6, pp. 957–971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y
  30. Money A., Coughlan J. Team-taught versus individually taught undergraduate education: a qualitative study of student experiences and preferences. Higher Education, 2016, vol. 72, issue 6, pp. 797–811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9976-5
  31. Narendran R., Almeida S., Coombes R., Hardie G., Quintana-Smark E., Zaher N., Wang H.-L., Chowdhury A., Stevenson B. The role of self-determination theory in developing curriculum for flipped classroom learning: A Case Study of First-Year Business Undergraduate Course. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2018, vol. 15, issue 5, art. 6. URL: https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol15/iss5/6
  32. Parding K., Berg-Jansson A., Sehlstedt T., McGrath – Champ S., Fitzgerald S. Differentiation as a Consequence of Choice and Decentralization Reforms—Conditions for Teachers’ Competence Development. Professions and Professionalism, 2017, vol. 7 (2), pp. e1855. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/pp.1855
  33. Rotgans J. I., Rajalingam P., Ferenczi M. A., Low-Beer N. A students’ model of team-based learning. Health Professions Education, 2018, in Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.10.003
  34. Samuelsson К. Teacher collegiality in context of institutional logics: A conceptual literature review. Professions and Professionalism, 2018, vol. 8 (3), pp. e2030. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/pp.2030
  35. Sedova K. A case study of a transition to dialogic teaching as a process of gradual change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 67, pp. 278–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.018
  36. Skalicky J., Pedersen K. W., van der Meer J., Fuglsang S., Dawson P., Stewart S. A framework for developing and supporting student leadership in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1522624
  37. Sripongwiwata S., Bunterma T., Tangb K. N. An investigation of learning stressors among secondary school students: A case study in northeast Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 2018, vol. 39, issue 2, pp. 197–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.06.002
  38. Surma T., Vanhoyweghen K., Camp G., Kirschner P. A. The coverage of distributed practice and retrieval practice in Flemish and Dutch teacher education textbooks. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 74, pp. 229–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.007
Date of the publication 28.02.2019