Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 7–22
© Nagovitsyn R. S., Saltykova M. V., Maksimova M. V., 2018
UDC: 
378+147+34

A synergistic approach to the promotion of foreign students’ socialization and adaptation to the educational environment of higher educational institutions

Nagovitsyn R. S. 1 (Glazov, Russian Federation), Saltykova M. V. 1 (Glazov, Russian Federation), Maksimova M. V. 1 (Glazov, Russian Federation)
1 Glazov State Pedagogical Institute
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4963
Abstract: 

Introduction. The study focuses on providing conceptual theoretical and methodological frameworks for educational process in multi-level multicultural groups. The purpose of the research is to reveal the peculiarities of adopting a synergetic approach to the promotion of adaptation and socialization of foreign students to the educational process of the university.
Materials and Methods. A synergistic approach is undertaken for the research purposes.
In order to solve the research problems, the authors employed a complex of complementary theoretical methods including the analysis of Russian and foreign educational theory, general scientific methods such as classification, comparison and generalization; experimental methods based on diagnostic tools and mathematical and statistical data-processing. Level characteristics of the indicators of foreign students’ adaptation and socialization were developed for different samples of students using a normal (Gaussian) distribution.
Results. The authors substantiated the use of a synergistic approach to the instruction of foreign students. The main essence of utilizing this approach is in organizing strictly systematized group classroom activities guided by a teacher of English and extracurricular activities provided by a tutor in purposefully changing in composition groups of foreign students, demonstrating different levels of adaptation and socialization. The effectiveness of the implementation of a synergistic approach to the process of adaptation and socialization of foreign students is experimentally proved through the development of teamwork skills, ability to tolerate social, cultural and personal differences and readiness for active interaction with the participants of the educational process.
Conclusions. The findings indicate the need to introduce a synergistic approach for effective instruction of foreign students in classroom and extracurricular formats in methodological, content and organizational aspects. Authors’ practical experience presented in the article can be used by other higher educational institutions for developing a professional multicultural environment.

Keywords: 

Synergistic approach; Adaptation of foreign students; Socialization of foreign students; Teaching English; Pedagogical institute; Classroom activities; Extracurricular activities

99.370 Pedagogical Support | Educational Process | Professional Competence

URL SCOPUS: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

A synergistic approach to the promotion of foreign students’ socialization and adaptation to the educational environment of higher educational institutions

For citation:
Nagovitsyn R. S., Saltykova M. V., Maksimova M. V. A synergistic approach to the promotion of foreign students’ socialization and adaptation to the educational environment of higher educational institutions. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 7–22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1806.01
References: 
  1. Bikbova L. N., Rigina N. A. Motivation of foreign students from near abroad when choosing the Russian higher educational establishment. Modern Higher School: Innovative Aspect, 2017, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 152–156. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29216815
  2. Danilova О. А., Somkin A. A., Meshkov V. M. The problem of motivation and methods of its increase at students of not language training direction in teaching foreign language. Integration of Education, 2016, vol. 20 (1), pp. 73–81. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.082.020.201601.073-081
  3. Zagvyazinsky V. I. About the leading reference points of preparation of a pedagogical personnel at university. Pedagogy, 2016, no. 9, pp. 77–83. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28100033
  4. Zemtsov S., Eremkin V., Barinova V. Factors of Attractiveness of the leading Russian universities overview of literature and econometric analysis of the leading universities. Educational Studies. Moscow, 2015, no. 4, pp. 201–233. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2015-4-201-233
  5. Zmeeva T. E. Teaching and learning English in a non-linguistic higher education institution: from independent work towards creative activity. Pedagogy, 2018, no. 7, pp. 82–90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35303027
  6. Elkina O. Ju., Lozovan L. Ya. Professional formation of the future teacher in the sociocultural environment of the university. Pedagogy, 2018, no. 4, pp. 78–83. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32856662
  7. Isakova A. A. Retrospective analysis of communicative competence development. Integration of Education, 2017, vol. 21 (1), pp. 46–53. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.086.021.201701.046-053
  8. Kryuchkov K. S., Orlov A. B. “Rogers' triad”: personal qualities or communicative processes? Voprosy Psychologii, 2018, no. 1, pp. 78–89. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32751773
  9. Makarova E. A. Teaching foreign language speaking skills through peer-tutoring. Integration of Education, 2018, vol. 22 (3), pp. 551–568. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.092.022.201803.551-568
  10. Nagovitsyn R. S., Miroshnichenko A. A., Senator S. Yu. Implementation of mobile pedagogy during continuous education of physical culture teachers. Integration of Education, 2018, vol. 22 (1), pp. 107–119. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.090.022.201801.107-119   
  11. Nagovitsyn R. S., Tutolmin A. V., Maksimov Y. G., Volkov P. B. Continuous college-to-university physical education technology: Case study of physical education and English language disciplines. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2018, no. 2, pp. 21–23. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32330536
  12. Romanenko N. M. Peculiarities of cross-cultural adaptation of foreign students (on the example of MGIMO). Pedagogy, 2018, no. 3, pp. 63–73. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32676184
  13. Sarantsev G. I. Harmonisation of training bachelor’s degree students in academic programme “Pedagogical education”. Integration of Education, 2016, vol. 20 (2), pp. 211–219. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.083.020.201602.211-219
  14. Smolyaninova O. G., Popova Ju. V. Development of ethnic tolerance of students in a multicultural educational environment. Pedagogy, 2017, no. 10, pp. 50–55. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32619760
  15. Uspenskaya E. A., Pasko U. V.Synergy academic and extracurricular space as a way to optimize the teaching of a foreign language. Pedagogy, 2016, no. 10, pp. 60–66. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=2810001
  16. Shcheblanova E. I. Psychological features of school adaptation of intellectually gifted adolescents. Voprosy Psychologii, 2017, no. 3, pp. 16–27. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30752586
  17. Scherbakov R. N. Synergetic approach in school training. Pedagogy, 2016, no. 4, pp. 3–11. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26193005
  18. Ansuategui F. J. A., Miravet L. M. Emotional and cognitive effects of peer tutoring among secondary school mathematics students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2017, vol. 48, issue 8, pp. 1185–1205. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1342284
  19. Douglass J. International berkeley: Past and current debates on the role of international students in an American University. Educational Studies. Moscow, 2015, no. 2, pp. 76–108. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2015-2-76-108
  20. Elboubekri A. The intercultural communicative competence and digital education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2017, vol. 45 (4), pp. 520–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516670994
  21. Gromov A. D. The academic mobility of foreign students in Russia. Russian Education and Society, 2017, no. 59 (1-2), pp. 21–37. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2017.1392799
  22. Mustafa G. M. M. Learning with each other: Peer learning as an academic culture among graduate students in education. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, vol. 5, issue 9, pp. 944–951. DOI: 10.12691/education-5-9-3 URL: http://www.sciepub.com/EDUCATION/abstract/8097
  23. Nagovitsyn R. S., Chigovskaya-Nazarova Ya. A., Miroshnichenko A. A., Senator S. Y. The realization of the system programme “Health saving education” in the pedagogical university. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2018, vol. 7 (1), pp. 137–149. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.1.137
  24. Nagovitsyn R. S., Senator S. Y., Maximova E. B., Neverova N. V., Sokolnikova E. I. Continuous professional education of teachers of physical education with the additional qualification in the field of foreign languages on the basis of competency-based approach. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2017, 17 Supplement issue 4, pp. 2170–2178. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.s4224
  25. Odağ Ö., Wallin H. R., Kedzior K. K. Definition of intercultural competence according to undergraduate students at an international university in Germany. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2016, vol. 20 (2), pp. 118–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315587105
  26. Parks E. Communicative criticality and savoir se reconnaitre: Emerging new competencies of criticality and intercultural communicative competence. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2018, vol. 18 (1), pp. 107–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1401691
  27. Perraton H. Foreign students in the twentieth century: a comparative study of patterns and policies in Britain, France, Russia and the United States. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2017, vol. 1 (2), pp. 161–186. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1303788
  28. Ponomarenko L. N., Zlobina I. S., Galitskih E. O., Rublyova O. S. Formation of the foreign language discursive competence of pedagogical faculties students in the process of intercultural dialogue. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2017, vol. 6 (1), pp. 89–99. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.1.89   
  29. Riaño Y., Van Mol C., Raghuram P. New directions in studying policies of international student mobility and migration. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2018, vol. 16 (3), pp. 283–294. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2018.1478721
  30. Schenker T. Fostering foreign language skills through an extracurricular drama project. Language Learning Journal, 2017, published online. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1406532
  31. Song Ya., Loewenstein G., Shi Ya. Heterogeneous effects of peer tutoring: Evidence from Rural Chinese Middle Schools. Research in Economics, 2018, vol. 72, issue 1, pp. 33–48. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2017.05.002
  32. Tarasova A. N. Acculturation and psychological adjustment of foreign students (the experience of Elabuga Institute of Kazan Federal University). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2017, vol. 237, pp. 1173–1178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.175
  33. Troth A. C., Jordan P. J., Lawrence S. A. Emotional intelligence, communication competence, and student perceptions of team social cohesion. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2012, vol. 30 (4), pp. 414–424. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912449447   
  34. Ullah I., Tabassum R., Kaleem M. Effects of peer tutoring on the academic achievement of students in the subject of biology at secondary level. Education Sciences, 2018, vol. 8 (3), pp. 112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030112
  35. Vershinina A., Kurbanov A., Panich N. Foreign students in the Soviet Union and modern Russia: Problems of adaptation and communication. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 236, pp. 295–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.12.032
  36. Wolff F., Borzikowsky C. Intercultural competence by international experiences? An investigation of the impact of educational stays abroad on intercultural competence and its facets. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2018, vol. 49 (3), pp. 488–514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118754721  
Date of the publication 31.12.2018